If you want to know why the financial
services industry keeps rolling in cash
and bonuses, one of the biggest reasons
is the billions of dollars in annual flows
($39.0 billion during the December quarter)
that add to the $1.2 TRILLION in funds
under management. Contributions to funds
with at least $50 million in assets over
the December quarter were $19.2 billion
in itself.
The super funds and administrators charge
a fee for their services, which is usually
linked to the size of the funds they are
managing. As the share market goes up,
so does their share of your super returns,
without them having to lift a finger on
your behalf.
Percentage-based fees have been a bonanza
for those who manage your super. For example,
if your fund charges you 2 per cent all
up, and you fund makes a return of 5 per
cent after tax, the fees amount to 40
per cent of your after-tax returns.
When the market goes up, your fund goes
up, but so do the fees you pay, simply
because they are a percentage of the total
fund value. This is a free lunch for those
who manage your fund, at your expense.
The fees do not reflect any value that
the managers have added. Instead, the
fees are simply the price you pay for
having someone sitting there and benefitting
from having been appointed to a watching
brief over your investment funds.
The super industry shares more than
$10 billion each year in fees. Ferraris,
Lamborghinis, Mosman homes, super yachts,
beach houses, overseas holidays, private
schools, and similar are all made possible
by this river of cash that has nowhere
else to flow to other than to the fund
managers who sit and wait for its monthly
arrival. Much of the income that flows
to the managers is simply for showing
up for work, rather than anything special
that they do for you. Market growth does
the work for them, and you end up paying
fees for it.
The sheer size of super funds means
that it is difficult for fund managers
to outperform the broader share market.
After fees and costs, they will generally
lag the share market. So what is it that
you are actually paying for, through the
fees that drain your super fund?
The answer is – in my opinion
– simply the comfort of having some
‘expert’ or ‘trusted
fund’ in place that you have nominated
as the caretaker of your retirement funds.
The fact that they then get rich on this
arrangement, and you don’t, is a
fact that is not seen by most of us because
the total flows are not really visible.
What can you do about this situation?
One good thing is that the Cooper review
into superannuation is underway. The spotlight
will certainly be trained on the issue
of fees and commissions that eat away
so much of our retirement nest egg.
One option is to consider establishing
your own Self Managed Super Fund (SMSF).
This makes good sense if you have a healthy
balance in your super fund, and has the
added advantage of enabling leveraged
investments into for example investment
property.
If you are considering an SMSF, you
need to ensure that you get expert advice
so that it can be set up correctly. McCarthy
Group is able to assist you with this
and provide all the support and specialist
advice required.
If you would like to learn more and discuss
how McCarthy Group can assist you, click
here.
|